Martin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MIRARCHI, Senior Judge.
Jere Martin (Claimant) and Red Rose Transit Authority (Employer) have filed cross-petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) that granted Claimant’s claim petition for a closed period of time. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
Claimant was a transit bus driver for Employer since 1965, a job requiring physical demands on his shoulders, arms, elbows, and neck. On September 12,1996, a car struck Claimant’s bus. As a result of the accident, Claimant experienced pain in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Innovative Spaces v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Topps Chewing Gum v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Craftsmen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Darrall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Brandywine Mazda Suzuki v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.