Brandywine Mazda Suzuki v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEADBETTER.
Brandywine Mazda Suzuki and Inservco petition for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which reversed the suspension of benefits paid to Richard Asman. Brandy-wine Mazda contends that the Board erred in requiring proof of job availability where the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) found that Asman, who had recovered sufficiently to return to work, had been fired for reasons unrelated to his work injury.
On July 13, 2001, approximately three weeks after starting work as a parts manager, Asman slipped and fell in the bathroom at work,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Somerset Welding & Steel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Montgomery Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Ocasio v. OllsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Harvey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Monongahela Valley Hospital)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Weissman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Harvey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Monongahela Valley Hospital)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.