Legal Opinion

LDA Incorporado v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 19, 2015No. Slip Op. 15-64; Court 12-00349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLY, Judge:

Before the court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Undisputed Facts and Proposed Conclusions of Law, which was submitted in lieu of trial. See Joint Stipulation Undisputed Facts Proposed Conclusions of Law, May 8, 2015, ECF No. 49 (separately “JSUF,” “Pl.’s PCL” and “Def.’s PCL”). 1 Familiarity with the case is presumed, however, the court provides a brief recitation of the procedural history of the case following the court’s earlier denial of Defendant United States’ (“Defendant” or “United States”) motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

On May 13,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Xerox Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Cemex, S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Xerox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Auxin Solar, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
  2. Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  3. Trimil S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API