Legal Opinion
Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2009No. H034441PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
Plaintiff Jasmine Networks, Inc. (Jasmine), brought this action charging Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (Marvell), and others with violating California’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Civ. Code, § 3426 et seq.) (CUTSA) by misappropriating certain trade secrets belonging to Jasmine. Not long after filing the action Jasmine went through bankruptcy proceedings, in the course of which it sold its rights in the alleged trade secrets, while reserving its rights of action for misappropriation commencing before the date of the transfer. As this lawsuit reached the verge of trial,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Christa Fischer v. Federal Express CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.