Matot v. Barnheisel
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Foell, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom
The motion of appellants to strike the cross errors assigned by appellee from the record, reserved to the hearing, is denied.
There has been a most flagrant violation of rule 18 of this court in the manner of the preparation of the abstract. The rule says that the party bringing a cause to this court “shall furnish a complete abstract or abridgment of the record. ’ ’ The document called an abstract is far from complying with this rule. The bill, the answer of Ebert in the nature of a bill of inter-pleader, the answer of appellants, the replication thereto, the master’s report and master’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paulsen v. ManskeIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Sorg v. CrandallIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Loeff v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Oliver v. WilhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Wertz v. MulloyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- M. Ecker & Co. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Burgoyne v. PyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. Manulife Real Estate Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Matot v. BarnheiselAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920