Legal Opinion

Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. Manulife Real Estate Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 26, 1990No. 1-89-3431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan

The plaintiff, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (Ryerson), brought suit to foreclose a mechanics’ lien on property owned by defendant Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (Manulife). Manulife had employed defendant E.W. Corrigan Construction Company (Corrigan) as the general contractor on a project requiring Corrigan to construct a new office building in Schaumburg, Illinois. Corrigan, in turn, entered into a subcontract with Crescent Corporation (Crescent) that required Crescent to fabricate and install a curtain wall on the project. Crescent then contracted with Ryerson for the furnishing of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Atlee Electric Co. v. Johnson Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Capitol Plumbing & Heating Supply, Inc. v. Van's Plumbing & HeatingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Christy v. Nabholz Supply Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Malkov Lumber Co. v. Serafine Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Bingaman v. DahmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. Manulife Real Estate Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Chicago Whirly, Inc. v. Amp Rite Electric Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API