Legal Opinion
Advance Realty Co. v. Spanos
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1957No. Docket 32, Calendar 47,207PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
Plaintiff real-estate company brought suit for a $700 real-estate commission claimed to have been due it as the result of an exclusive real-estate agency contract for the sale of defendant’s house. The facts are not in dispute. The agency contract provided in its crucial paragraph as follows:
“If during said period, the property is sold by you or me or anyone else; or if you or any member of the Lansing Boaid of Realtors produce a purchaser ready, willing and able to purchase the property; or if it shall be sold within 3 months after the expiration to any persons with whom you or any member of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boyd & Williams v. J. J. Watson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Wood v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Brooks v. LeathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Reade v. HaakMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Stratford Arms Hotel Co. v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ladd v. TeichmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Lee v. DesenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Barber v. VernonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Sase v. EifrateMichigan Supreme Court · 1958