Legal Opinion

Advance Realty Co. v. Spanos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1957No. Docket 32, Calendar 47,207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

Plaintiff real-estate company brought suit for a $700 real-estate commission claimed to have been due it as the result of an exclusive real-estate agency contract for the sale of defendant’s house. The facts are not in dispute. The agency contract provided in its crucial paragraph as follows:

“If during said period, the property is sold by you or me or anyone else; or if you or any member of the Lansing Boaid of Realtors produce a purchaser ready, willing and able to purchase the property; or if it shall be sold within 3 months after the expiration to any persons with whom you or any member of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boyd & Williams v. J. J. Watson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Wood v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Brooks v. LeathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Reade v. HaakMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Stratford Arms Hotel Co. v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ladd v. TeichmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lee v. DesenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Barber v. VernonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Sase v. EifrateMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API