Legal Opinion

Sase v. Eifrate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1958No. Docket No. 24, Calendar No. 47,373Published

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The plaintiff realty broker, declaring in Detroit common pleas, says that he timely obtained a husband-and-wife purchaser who was ready, willing and able to acquire defendants’ premises as listed with him for sale; that on account thereof he has earned a commission owing him by defendants in the sum of $1,425, and that defendants persist in refusing to pay.

It was shown in evidence that defendants’ home in Detroit was duly listed — in writing — with plaintiff for sale. The instrument materially provided:

“If a purchaser is obtained for said property by anyone, including the undersigned, during…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schneider v. PomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Book Furniture Co. v. ChanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fruchter v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Advance Realty Co. v. SpanosMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Beatty v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API