Legal Opinion

Tucci v. City of Biddeford

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 14, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.

[¶ 1] Peter Tucci appeals from the summary judgment granted by the Superior Court (York County, Brennan, J.) to the City of Biddeford. Tucci sought the refund of fees he paid to the City for sewer services assessed to the business property he leased. Tucci argues that the court erred in applying the estimated benefits analysis and contends that he was entitled to summary judgment on his claim for unjust enrichment. We agree with Tucci’s contention regarding the estimated benefits analysis, but we also conclude that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to whether the City was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Rogers v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. MainsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Maine Eye Care Associates P.A. v. GormanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. Eastern Maine Medical Center v. Walgreen Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  4. LOBSTER 207 LLC v. PETTEGROWDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
  5. MARCHESE v. TRIGRAM EDUCATION PARTNERS LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API