Legal Opinion
Robert Eldridge Jennison v. B.D. Goldsmith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 8, 1991No. 87-2977PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
The question is whether petitioner Jenni-son exhausted state remedies, although he failed to present his claims to the Arizona Supreme Court, on the basis of that Court’s declarations in Arizona v. Shattuck, 140 Ariz. 582, 684 P.2d 154, 157 (1984) and Arizona v. Sandon, 161 Ariz. 157, 777 P.2d 220, 221 (1989) (en banc), that state remedies were exhausted without seeking review in the Arizona Supreme Court. The district court held he did not. 1 We agree.
The Arizona Supreme Court held in Shat-tuck counsel need not petition the Court for review to satisfy the obligation imposed upon counsel by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Castille v. PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Ozzie Batchelor v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, James Redden, Solicitor General, Walter L. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dwayne Randall JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Samuel W. Swoopes v. Sam Sublett Grant Woods, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- John David Roettgen v. Dale Copeland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Shelton R. Thomas v. Bob GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Phillip J. Harmon v. Charles Ryan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.