Legal Opinion

Samuel W. Swoopes v. Sam Sublett Grant Woods, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1999No. 94-16033PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Per curiam

We consider this appeal on remand from the Supreme -Court for further consideration in light of O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 119 S.Ct. 1728, 144 L.Ed.2d 1 (1999), decided after issuance of our prior decision in this case. After reconsideration, we conclude that Arizona state prisoners need not appeal an Arizona Court of Appeals’ denial of post-conviction relief to the Arizona Supreme Court in order to exhaust their state remedies for federal habeas corpus purposes, except in capital cases or cases involving the imposition of a life sentence.

I

Samuel Swoopes, an Arizona state prisoner,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. State v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Phillip J. Harmon v. Charles Ryan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Robert Eldridge Jennison v. B.D. Goldsmith, Warden Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Frank E. Adams v. Flora J. Holland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Ellis v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API