Legal Opinion
John David Roettgen v. Dale Copeland, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 16, 1994No. 93-15760PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Per curiam
John David Roettgen, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus. The district court determined that Roettgen had not fairly presented his claims to the Arizona Supreme Court, and dismissed his petition for failure to exhaust available state remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we review de novo. Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm.
A petitioner has not satisfied the exhaustion requirement unless he has fairly presented his claim to the highest state court.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Castille v. PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Carl Anthony Thomas v. Samuel A. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Applications of OppenheimerArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Robert Eldridge Jennison v. B.D. Goldsmith, Warden Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Kou Lo Vang v. State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Moreno v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Melvin Bernard Coley v. David A. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Doub BINFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William RHODE; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.