Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Armour & Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1979No. 12751PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice, Pro Tem.

This appeal concerns the applicability of the Idaho Employment Security Law to the claimant-appellant, Gabriel Ortiz, Jr., who had been declared eligible for unemployment benefits under such law by an appeals examiner for the Department of Employment.

The appellant in his brief correctly outlines the course of this matter to this point and it is set forth as follows:

“Claimant was discharged from Armour & Company on November 29, 1976. He filed for benefits on December 1, 1976, and was declared ineligible for benefits by the initial claims examiner of the Department. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johns v. SH Kress & CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Avery v. B & B RENTAL TOILETSIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Weston v. Gritman Memorial HospitalIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Pacific Nat. Life Assur. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Folks v. Moscow School District No. 281Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kyle v. Beco Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Roll v. City of MiddletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kennedy's Piggly Wiggly Stores, Inc. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. Yoldash v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API