Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Kollmeyer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1908No. 2,694PublishedCited by 24 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court oí the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This writ challenges a judgment of $4,000 against Armour & Co., a corporation, for damages on account of personal injuries inflicted on Kollmeyer, the plaintiff below, by the alleged negligence of one of its drivers. Kollmeyer alleged in his pleading that, as he was driving in a one-horse spring wagon slowly south along the west side of Fourteenth street in St. Louis, Mo., the defendant’s driver drove its one-horse meat wagon rapidly into collision with his wagon, raised one side of it so that there was reason to believe, and the plaintiff did believe, that there was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Specht v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Union Pac. R. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. State v. BurchettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. James Stewart & Co. v. NewbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
  5. Oates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API