Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Yellow Cab Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 1943No. 57PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff brought an action for damages for alleged illegal conduct of defendants by which he was prevented from operating. *684a taxicab. Trial by jury was demanded by plaintiff and the case was set for trial on Tuesday, October 27, 1942. On that day parties and their counsel were present in court at 10 a. m. but the case was not reached until about 3 p. m. At that time a “long panel” of jurors was not available but both sides agreed to accept a “short panel” of twelve jurors. Apparently one of the twelve was disqualified or excused, since by agreement the jury sworn to try…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Harrah v. MorgenthauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
- Gilbert v. LachapelleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ammerman v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hillyard v. Smither & Mayton, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Etty v. MiddletonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Boyer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Glover v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.