Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1985No. 8315SC1102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

In the decision of this court reported in Smith v. Nationwide, supra, the summary judgment for defendant South Carolina Insurance Company (South Carolina) entered by the trial court was affirmed because defendant Nationwide failed to substantially comply with the clear terms of G.S. 20-310(f) when it failed to renew the automobile policy of its insured, Paul Allen Smith.

In our resolution of the case on appeal we noted that:

For the purposes of the summary judgment motion, Nationwide stipulated that its insured, Paul Allen Smith, tendered partial payment of the premium on 6 July…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Asheville Contracting Co. v. City of WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Atlantic Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Sanders v. American Spirit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Peerless Insurance v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Peerless Insurance v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API