Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1970No. 691SC561PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The plaintiff insurer does not challenge the court’s findings of fact but contends that the findings do not support the conclusions of law and the judgment entered thereon.

It is conceded, and the court so found, that no notice of cancellation was given by plaintiff insurer to the insured or to the State Motor Vehicles Department. If notice to either was required in order to terminate coverage under the policy, the judgment is supported. We therefore discuss the circumstances under which such notice must be given by the insurer in order to effectively terminate coverage under an automobile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Crisp v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Perkins v. American Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. HaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Levinson v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hales v. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Shqeir v. Equifax, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. White v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1972
  4. Yovish v. United Services Automobile Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Olivine Corp. v. United Capitol Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API