Legal Opinion

Sanders v. American Spirit Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1999No. COA98-1247PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s grant of defendant’s summary judgment motion proffered pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c)(1990) (defendant’s motion). The sole issue for our determination is whether an automobile insurance policy issued by defendant (the policy) provides underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage to plaintiff for injuries sustained while a passenger in an automobile driven by defendant’s named insured Joan Johnson (Johnson). We conclude the policy provides such coverage and that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion.

The following pertinent facts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Dunn v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Hales v. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Pearson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Erie Insurance Exchange v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Farm Bureau Insurance v. BlongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Blackburn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Lunsford v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API