Legal Opinion

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 5, 1997No. 96-P-175PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

On the basis of a competitive examination, Leslie Langston had qualified in December, 1992, for appointment as a police officer in Cambridge. The appointing authority of that city developed some adverse facts about Langston in a record check and obtained permission from the administrator of the State Department of Personnel Administration (the “Administrator”) to “bypass” her in accordance with G. L. c. 31, § 27. The Civil Service Commission reversed and ordered that the city re-certify Langston. A judge of the Superior Court, who considered the case under the State Administrative Procedure…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. T.D.J. Development Corp. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  2. Murray v. Second District Court of Eastern MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. City of Gloucester v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Court of Eastern MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Bielawski v. Personnel Administrator of the Division of Personnel AdministrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Brackett v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. City of Boston v. Boston Police Patrolmen's Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Massachusetts Ass'n of Minority Law Enforcement Officers v. AbbanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Lopez v. MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API