Legal Opinion

Bielawski v. Personnel Administrator of the Division of Personnel Administration

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 17, 1996PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

This action arises from five separate decisions by the board of selectmen of Dedham (selectmen) to “bypass” the plaintiff pursuant to G. L. c. 31, § 27 (1994 ed.), for a promotion from patrolman to sergeant. The plaintiff com*460plains that the actions of the appointing authority and the Civil Service Commission (commission) in regard to these bypasses violated the requirements of the civil service statute, G. L. c. 31, and infringed his “civil rights” as protected by the State and Federal Constitutions. A Superior Court judge granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in December, 1993.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Boston Police Superior Officers Federation v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. City of Cambridge v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Brackett v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Shabazz v. ColeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  5. Massachusetts Ass'n of Minority Law Enforcement Officers v. AbbanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API