Legal Opinion

City of Boston v. Boston Police Patrolmen's Ass'n

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 4, 2005PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

This case presents one of those “rare instances” in which an arbitrator’s award must be vacated as contrary to “an explicit, well-defined, and dominant public policy.” Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, *814Dist. 17, 531 U.S. 57, 62, 63 (2000). See Lynn v. Thompson, 435 Mass. 54 (2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1131 (2002). The arbitrator, chosen by mutual agreement of the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association (association) and the city of Boston (city) pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, required the city to rescind its termination of John DiSciullo, a police…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Plymouth-Carver Regional School District v. J. Farmer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. City of Lynn v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. City of Cambridge v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  5. Massachusetts Highway Department v. American Federation of State, Council 93Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Southland Life InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  2. Kitsap County Deputy Sheriff's Guild v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kitsap Deputy Sheriff's Guild v. Kitsap Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Massachusetts Nurses Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Sheriff of Suffolk County v. Jail Officers & Employees of Suffolk CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API