Legal Opinion

T.D.J. Development Corp. v. Conservation Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 28, 1994No. 92-P-1094PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

Pursuant to the Wetlands Protection Act, G. L. c. 131, § 40, and the town’s wetland protection bylaw, chapter 178, the plaintiff filed a notice of intent with the conservation commission of North Andover for the filling of 250 square feet of bordering vegetative wetlands and the performance of work in the buffer zone adjacent to the wetlands in order to construct a roadway in its subdivision. The commission approved the work subject to forty-six conditions.

To a number of those conditions the plaintiff objected and filed an appeal with the Department of Environmental Protection (department)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. American Family Life Assurance Co. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Forsyth School for Dental Hygienists v. Board of Registration in DentistryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Cotter v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Golden v. Board of Selectmen of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. City of Cambridge v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  4. Fafard v. Conservation Commission of ReadingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Conservation Commission v. PachecoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API