Legal Opinion

Halverson v. Sonotone Corp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1947No. File No. 8850PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

Following our decision on the prior appeal of this case, Halverson v. Sonotone Corporation, 70 S. D. 489, 19 N. W.2d 14, 161 A. L. R. 292, the motion to quash the service of the summons and complaint was brought on for hearing before the trial court and resulted in an order refusing to quash the service. At the time of the hearing on the motion to quash service, the court considered an application of the plaintiff to amend the affidavit of service which application the court granted and accepted in lieu of the original affidavit of service, an amended affidavit. It is from the order refusing…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. State v. PsarasWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Cockran v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Larry Alexander v. Avera St. Luke's HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. Steen v. PottsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Lied Motor Car Co. v. Maxey. Harrill v. MaxeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  5. Meisel v. Piggly Wiggly Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API