Schlichting v. Radke

Plaintiff brought this proceeding to recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (R.C. 1919, Section 9436 et seq., as amended, SDC Title 64). The industrial commissioner made findings of fact in favor of the defendants and denied an award. An appeal was taken to the circuit court which reversed the holding of the industrial commissioner and entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.

The industrial commissioner found the facts, as follows:

“1. That for about three weeks prior to September 19, 1937, Louis Schlichting was employed by August Radke as a…