Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Toby

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for new trial on the minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

This action was brought to recover on a contract" of sale for berries sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant.

An arrangement was made, between the' defendant and the plaintiffs’ salesman, for the adjustment of a disputed account of prior sales made by the plaintiffs to the defendant. The settlement was subject, however, to the approval of the plaintiffs, on receipt of the defendant’s check for thirty-six dollars, the amount of said adjustment. Defendant’s letter accompanied said check making its acceptance, by the plaintiffs, a condition of said adjustment. The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Becker v. . BoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Wilson v. . DoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Taylor v. . B.E.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Wright v. John A. Robinson & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sieverts v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hirsh v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Stieglitz v. CohenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
  4. Sieverts v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API