Legal Opinion

Sieverts v. White

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1954No. 7889Published

1Opinion of the Court

2 Utah 2d 351 (1954)

273 P.2d 974

ARNOLD SIEVERTS, JOHN SIEVERTS, ALBERT SIEVERTS, JAMES SIEVERTS AND ABRAHAM SIEVERTS, JR., A CO-PARTNERSHIP DOING BUSINESS AS INLAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS,

v.

DONALD M. WHITE AND LAVINE H. WHITE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

No. 7889.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 2, 1954.

McKay, Burton, McMillan & Richards, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Fred L. Finlinson, Arthur A. Allen, Jr., Salt Lake City, for respondent.

DUNFORD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, a co-partnership, on June 7, 1950, entered into a Uniform Real Estate Contract…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Radalj v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Cole v. ColeUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Woods v. DixonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Sieverts v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API