Legal Opinion

Hirsh v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1916No. 2916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. N. J. Harris, Judge. Action by Ralph Hirsh and Solomon Dryfoos, co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of Hirsh & Dry-foos, against the Ogden Furniture & Carpet Company. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

On September 3, 1915, the plaintiffs, Ralph Hirsh and Solomon Dryfoos, copartners doing business in Philadelphia, Pa., commenced an action in the District Court of Weber County by serving summons on the defendant, a corporation doing business at Ogden, Utah, to recover upon an account for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant “between July 1, 1914, and June 21, 1915,” amounting to $326.40, for which sum, with legal interest from June 21, 1915, plaintiffs demand judgment. The defendant appeared in the action and answered as follows:

“Admits the allegations of paragraphs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. John A. Robinson & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Colton v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lowe v. Yolo County Consolidated Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Larsen v. BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Nidever v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Luebben v. MetlenMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Cole v. ColeUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Sieverts v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Boise Lumber Co. v. Independent School DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Hirsh v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API