Legal Opinion

Stieglitz v. Cohen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, fifth district, rendered in favor of the defendant after a trial before the court and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtPlatzek, J.

Hear the close of the trial, in open court and in the presence of the jury, the defendant’s attorney stated: “I wish to offer in tender to plaintiff $26.68 rent for four days and $1.50, approximately, for interest and $3 for the disbursements in this action, amounting to $31.18. I make that tender into court.” The plaintiff’s counsel then said: “ It is too late entirely for a tender. It is a question for the'jury to say.” Defendant’s counsel: “I pay it into court to make our tender good.” Plaintiff’s counsel: “ I ask the jury to be directed not to pay any attention to this sort of thing.” The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. TobyNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Ellenstein v. KleeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  3. Levy v. LoewAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Leong Dung DyeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  2. Douglas v. ReynardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  3. Caluori v. Western Union Telegraph Co., New York County Courts1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API