Legal Opinion

Taylor v. . B.E.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1890PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We think the order was right. The moneys belonged to the plaintiff from the moment of their deposit, by force of their payment into court under this order. The provisions of the Code permit this procedure by a defendant, in all actions brought for the recovery either of a sum certain, or of damages for a casual, or involuntary, personal injury. They provide for the tender of such a sum of money, as the defendant conceives to be sufficient to make amends for the injury, together with the costs to date. The appellant's counsel contends, however, for a distinction between a tender of amends, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Becker v. . BoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Slack v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Cæsar v. CapellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1897
  3. Mann v. . SproutNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Fleder v. ItkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Hole v. HampNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API