Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 20, 2009No. Civil 05-144-B-HPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PART 2: VALUATION 1
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
The current issue I must decide in this corporate oppression case is a Maine corporation’s value on September 15, 2005. The pertinent Maine statute instructs me to determine “fair value.” 13-C M.R.S.A. § 1434(2)(A). The Maine Law Court has not interpreted that particular provision, but it has interpreted the identical language in Maine’s appraisal rights chapter (title 13-C, chapter 13 of the Maine statutes), available to dissenting shareholders. In re Valuation of Common Stock of McLoon Oil Co., 565…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- In Re Valuation of Common Stock of McLoon Oil Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- In Re Valuation of Common Stock of Libby, McNeill & LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Herman v. Springfield Massachusetts AreaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Brooks v. Brooks Furniture Mfgrs., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- Brooks v. Brooks Furniture Mfgrs., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- STATE OF MAINE v. 3M COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023