Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY THE THIRD REPORT AND INTERIM ORDER OF THE SPECIAL MASTER
D. BROCK HORNBY; District Judge.
In this corporate oppression case, the parties disagree over the scope of the buyout remedy that I have ordered.
The plaintiff shareholder, Richard E. Kaplan, argues that in March 2009,1 ruled that the buyout includes not only his individually owned stock in the defendant First Hartford Corporation, but also stock where he has or shares dispositive power. 1 Together, these interests amount to roughly 19 percent of the company’s outstanding stock…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beltran v. Olam Spices and Vegetables, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Droesch v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Schneider v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020