Legal Opinion

STATE OF MAINE v. 3M COMPANY

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 26, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00210Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE STATE OF MAINE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:23-cv-00210-JAW ) 3M COMPANY, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON MOTIONS TO REMAND AND STAY Based on a state plaintiff’s express and enforceable disclaimer against seeking recovery in this lawsuit from the defendants for claims relating to aqueous film- forming foam, the sole basis for federal jurisdiction, this Court concludes that it does not have jurisdiction over a parens patriae lawsuit against manufacturers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and grants the state’s motion to remand the case to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API