Ingledue v. Davidson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
Appellant brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by him from an explosion of gas. Prom a judgment rendered in favor of respondent upon a directed verdict he has appealed. It appears from the evidence that on the sixth day of May, 1922, appellant went to respondent’s restaurant about noon for a lunch. He had made his order and was sitting on a stool at the lunch-counter facing a large mirror that was attached to and rested against the wall some six feet in front of and to the west of him. This mirror was from twenty-five to thirty feet long and about…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Connor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Jianou v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Keller v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Davidson v. American Liquid Gas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bruce v. RisleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.