Legal Opinion

Ingledue v. Davidson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1929No. Docket No. 3921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

Appellant brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by him from an explosion of gas. Prom a judgment rendered in favor of respondent upon a directed verdict he has appealed. It appears from the evidence that on the sixth day of May, 1922, appellant went to respondent’s restaurant about noon for a lunch. He had made his order and was sitting on a stool at the lunch-counter facing a large mirror that was attached to and rested against the wall some six feet in front of and to the west of him. This mirror was from twenty-five to thirty feet long and about…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Connor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Jianou v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Keller v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Davidson v. American Liquid Gas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Bruce v. RisleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API