Legal Opinion

Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1918No. S. F. No. 7815PublishedCited by 54 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment that he take nothing. At the close of the plaintiff’s case the trial court directed the jury to render a verdict for defendant, and upon the verdict so rendered the judgment was given. The principal question on this appeal is as to the correctness of the action of the trial court in so directing the jury. It is now settled that the right of a court to direct a verdict is, with regard to the condition of the evidence, absolutely the same as the right of a court to grant a nonsuit; and also that a court may grant a nonsuit only when, disregarding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Colburn v. Washington State Art Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API