Goldstein v. Healy
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. Emmett Seawell, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShurtleff, J.
Plaintiff in his second amended complaint alleged that at the time of the commencement of the action he was a minor under the age of twenty-one years, and that Ben Goldstein was the duly appointed, qualified, and acting guardian of his person and estate; “that on or about the fifth day of July, 1919, the defendants [there being one fictitious defendant] . . . were conducting and maintaining at Monte Rio, in the county of Sonoma, state of California, a summer resort and hotel for the accommodation of the public. . . . That as a part of the said summer resort and hotel and as living quarters…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Ten Broeck v. Wells, Fargo & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1891
3Cited by60 opinions
- Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Anthony (Tony) Gaston v. Anna Ramirez PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.