Legal Opinion
Mizner v. Mizner
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1968No. 5396PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*269OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, C. J.:
We are asked to set aside a partial summary judgment of our district court in so far as it accords full faith and credit to an alimony award contained in a California interlocutory divorce decree entered upon extraterritorial personal service of process. It is our opinion that the district court ruled correctly.
Mr. and Mrs. Mizner maintained their matrimonial domicile at Kings Beach, Lake Tahoe, California, from April 1947 to March 1965. They separated and the husband moved to Nevada. In May of the following year, 1966, he commenced an action for divorce…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Mitchim v. MitchimTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Trump v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Arbella Mutual Insurance v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Stucky v. StuckyNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.