Legal Opinion

Williams v. SCM Proctor Silex

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1983No. 8212SC222PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Claimant appeals from a judgment affirming a decision by defendant Employment Security Commission that she is disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits because she was discharged from employment for misconduct connected with her work. She contends the pertinent findings are not supported by competent evidence, and that the conclusion of law that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work was therefore erroneous. We affirm.

The Commission made the following pertinent findings of fact:

2. Claimant was discharged from this job for reporting an inaccurate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. In Re CollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Matter of CantrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. In Re ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Baxter v. Bowman Gray School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API