Bonde v. Bishop
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Action for declaratory relief and to declare defendants’ tree which overhangs plaintiffs’ premises a nuisance. Defendants appeal from a judgment ordering defendants to abate the nuisance and awarding $200 damages.
Questions Presented
1. The law concerning encroaching trees.
2. Sufficiency of the evidence to prove (a) a nuisance and (b) damages.
2. Evidence(a) Nuisance
There is substantial evidence to support the court’s finding that the branches of the tree overhanging plaintiffs’ property constitute a nuisance and an ever present danger to plaintiffs’ premises. On defendants’ property,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gallagher v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Stevens v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Commonwealth v. BlaisdellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Shook v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Cannon v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Roberts v. KarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.