Legal Opinion

Bonde v. Bishop

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1952No. Civ. 15163PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Action for declaratory relief and to declare defendants’ tree which overhangs plaintiffs’ premises a nuisance. Defendants appeal from a judgment ordering defendants to abate the nuisance and awarding $200 damages.

Questions Presented

1. The law concerning encroaching trees.

2. Sufficiency of the evidence to prove (a) a nuisance and (b) damages.

2. Evidence(a) Nuisance

There is substantial evidence to support the court’s finding that the branches of the tree overhanging plaintiffs’ property constitute a nuisance and an ever present danger to plaintiffs’ premises. On defendants’ property,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Stevens v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Commonwealth v. BlaisdellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Shook v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Cannon v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Roberts v. KarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API