Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Karr
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 2, 1960No. Civ. 6018PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment awarding them $300 damages upon the ground that the amount thereof was inadequate.
The complaint in this case sets forth two causes of action the allegations of which, with one exception, are substantially identical.
With respect to the issue of liability, it is alleged that in July, 1955, the plaintiffs “employed” E. R. Karr, a licensed surveyor, who now is deceased, to survey certain real property owned by them, to determine the elevation thereof, and to determine the amount of dirt which could be removed in leveling it to an elevation of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Union Oil Company v. James J. Oppen and John J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Davy v. Public National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Stuart v. Crestview Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Overgaard v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.