Legal Opinion
Shook v. Pearson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 7, 1950No. Civ. 4069PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, Acting P. J.
The trial court made an order of dismissal after sustaining defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiff appealed.
The first cause of action alleges that defendants, in May, 1948, in consideration of plaintiff’s agreement to act as sales agent for them, entered into an oral contract whereby defendants granted plaintiff the exclusive agency for the marketing of defendants’ products; that plaintiff performed all of the terms and conditions of the agreement on his part; and that defendants agreed to pay plaintiff 10 per cent of the list price of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Jacobson v. Oakland Meat & Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Mitchell v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bacon v. WahrhaftigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.