Legal Opinion

Franke v. Wiltschek

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 9, 1953No. 96, Docket 22843PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*494CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This action seeking an injunction and an accounting of profits received is based upon the alleged misappropriation by defendants of trade secrets learned during and in consequence of a confidential relationship existing between them and the plaintiffs.

From 1943 to 1951, plaintiffs, citizens óf New Jersey, manufactured certain compressed cotton bath sponges for Schiaparelli. The finished product was a pellet which when dropped into water expanded into a piece of cotton about four inches wide by six inches long. The process and utility of thus compressing sheets of unwoven…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. David Carpenter, Kenneth P. Felis, and R. Foster WinansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API