Fox v. Conway
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
The jury in its special findings found that the whistle on the interurban car was not blown as it approached the crossing, and the car was being operated with dim lights. ' The petition likewise alleged that the car was being operated at a speed of eighty miles an hour. In determining whether the special findings are inconsistent with the general verdict the court does not consider the evidence, but only the pleadings, issues and special and general findings. Board of Commissioners of Mercer County v. Deitsch, 94 Ohio St., 1, 113 N. E., 745.
There was, therefore, ample to show negligence on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. RohrsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. RusynikOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Toledo Term. Rd. Co. v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. LeeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Board of Commissioners v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Young v. Featherstone Motors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
- Hamilton v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Eastern Motor Dispatch, Inc. v. Pennsylvania R. R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Erie Railroad v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Gearhart v. Columbus Ry., Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.