Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1952No. 22303PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HURD, J:

This was an action of tort instituted by plaintiff to recover damages for injuries claimed to have been proximately caused by defendant’s negligence when plaintiff was a passenger on one of defendant’s motor coaches.

A noval factual situation is presented, involving important principles of law governing common carrier-passenger relationships. Plaintiff alleges in her second amended petition, in substance, that on or about the 12th day of April, 1949, at about fiv.e o’clock P. M. she became a passenger on a Cedar Avenue line bus operating in a generally easterly direction in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klever v. Reid Bros. Express, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Prendergast v. GinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ohio Fuel Gas Co. v. RinglerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Fox v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. Featherstone Motors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Helen Martin and Walter H. Martin v. Erie-Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Erie Railroad v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Wallace v. WallaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Wallace v. WallaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API