Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Lee

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924No. 18250PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobinson, J.

The parties will be referred to in this opinion in the relation that they occupied in the trial court rather than in the relation they occupy here.

The record of plaintiff’s evidence in chief discloses that at the time of the happening, of the events out of which this action grew the highway at the point of crossing the tracks of the defendant company, known as Dignan’s Crossing, and for a considerable distance each way therefrom, ran substantially in a northerly and southerly direction; that the tracks of the defendant company crossed the highway in a southeasterly and northwesterly direction…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. RusynikOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Mikula v. TailorsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Toledo Term. Rd. Co. v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Winkler v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Babbitt v. SayOhio Supreme Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API