Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation District v. Coughanour

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a statutory proceeding to foreclose three certificates of delinquency representing taxes and assessments levied for the years 1928, 1929, and 1930 against certain tracts of land in PayetteOregon Slope Irrigation District, owned by the defendant Lillian Gr. Spofford Lemp. From a decree of foreclosure, the defendant appeals.

The defendant contends that the irrigation district assessments for the above-mentioned years are null and void for the reason that certain irrigable lands owned by the plaintiff and by Malheur County, within the district, were omitted to her material injury.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hassan v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. In Re the New York Protestant Episcopal Public SchoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Powell v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Ryan v. AltschulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Keizer v. Lake Labish Water Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Penrose v. Whitacre Ex Rel. County of LyonNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Penrose v. WhitacreNevada Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Thirty Mile Canal Co. v. CarskadonNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API