Legal Opinion

Penrose v. Whitacre

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1943No. 3367Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

W. M. Kearney, of Reno, for Appellant Walker River Irrigation District. ■ Franklin H. Koehler, of Yerington, for Appellant Walter Whitacre. John R. Ross, of Carson City, for Respondents.

OPINION

By the Court,

Taber, J.:

The last sentence of sec. 49% of the irrigation district act, sec. 8066 N. C. L. 1929, reads: “All the provisions of this act where applicable shall apply to such improvement districts.” It is the contention of appellants that this provision makes each improvement district a complete irrigation district in itself, with each, every and all of the powers vested in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gadd v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. State ex rel. Bancroft v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Schenck v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Hendrich v. Walker River Irrigation DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API