Legal Opinion

Penrose v. Whitacre Ex Rel. County of Lyon

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1942No. 3367PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Taber, J.:

In 1935, and for a number of years prior thereto, a large part of the lands in improvement district No. 2 of the Walker river irrigation district became more and more waterlogged until the growth of crops and pasture was seriously interfered with, and it was difficult or impossible for land owners in said improvement district to borrow money from the federal land bank.

There are four improvement districts in the Walker river irrigation district, and the board of directors of the latter acts as the board of directors of each of the improvement districts. For the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. DaytonNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation District v. CoughanourOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. McKinney v. Helms, County AuditorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sheriff, Washoe County v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Industrial Insurance System v. JeschNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cragun v. Nevada Public Employees' Retirement BoardNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Application of MartinNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Ames v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API