State Bank v. Swenson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff prevailed below in its suit to set aside as fraudulent a certain conveyance of real property. The court denied defendants’ motion for new trial, and the appeal is from that order.
Appellants, Swen G. and -Guri Swenson, are husband and wife. Defendant Mildred Davis has not appealed. We shall refer hereafter to appellants as if they were the only defendants.
Plaintiff bank was the owner and bolder of certain promissory notes executed by defendant Swen. These notes antedated the transfer of real estate hereafter to be mentioned. The notes were reduced to judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seitz v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Thompson v. SchiekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Minneapolis Stock-Yards & Packing Co. v. HalonenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kummet v. ThielenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- George Reilly, as trustee of the Nathan L. Bentson 1993 Irrevocable Trust v. Michael J. AntonelloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Texas Commerce Bank v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Brennan v. FriedellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.