Legal Opinion

Seitz v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1877No. 189PublishedCited by 85 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong

The complainant in the court below sought to subject two pieces of real prbperty in the city of Washington to the payment of several judgments recovered by the firm, of which he is the surviving partner, against George Seitz, one of the defendants. His bill alleges the recovery of those judgments, one on the ninth day of June and the other on the fourteenth day of December, 1868, the issue of executions thereon, and returns of nulla hona made by the marshal. It alleges further, that George Seitz, on the thirteenth day of January, 1870, purchased from one Kendall lot No. 61 in square 448, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryder v. . HulseNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Duncan v. RoselleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Kane v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  2. Farley v. KittsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Lins v. LenhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Weil v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. McCrory v. DonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API