Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
In this fraudulent-conveyance dispute, appellants argue that the district court erred by granting summary judgment to respondent on its claim that appellants engaged in fraudulent transfers of assets to prevent respondent from levying on those assets to enforce its money judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts are derived from the parties’ submissions to the district court in connection with the summary-judgment motion of respondent Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America (bank) and are undisputed. In support of its summary-judgment motion, the bank submitted a memorandum…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014