Legal Opinion

Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 2013No. A12-1257PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

In this fraudulent-conveyance dispute, appellants argue that the district court erred by granting summary judgment to respondent on its claim that appellants engaged in fraudulent transfers of assets to prevent respondent from levying on those assets to enforce its money judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts are derived from the parties’ submissions to the district court in connection with the summary-judgment motion of respondent Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America (bank) and are undisputed. In support of its summary-judgment motion, the bank submitted a memorandum…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API